| |
|
MARTIALFORCE.COM
GAMES WITH WORDS
Did you make that up or did you
develop it?
Did your instructors before you
develop it, or did they make it up?
Do you know the difference? Does
saying that the "old masters" developed it and today's new masters are
making it up, makes you feel special or, are you implying that today's new
masters are not as competent?
Is their room for new masters?
Hell yes and you would be an idiot to think not.
Perhaps you are saying that you are linked to past
traditions and therefore better than? "I don't think so". If you believe
that there are plenty of reality shows, and you need to call Scotty so he
can beam you back to earth's reality.
Let us take for example guns and use it as a metaphor for
technique. Did you think that in the Old West where guns were a matter of
survival, Jesse James, with his skill and accuracy, would have chanced it
against someone with a "glock 21-45 caliber"? Answer:
"Hell no"!
There will always be a
need for change. We live in a world of constant change, filled with creative
inquisitive minds, always striving to make things work better.
If you're one of those people that accepts things as they
are and are loyal to training in the old ways, that's fantastic, but why
allow yourself to stop there? Do not interfere with progress. Ask yourself,
"can martial arts be improved upon"? Do you really need me to answer that?
Believe it or not, there are some out there that believe that the martial
arts cannot be improved upon, and should be taught as they have always been.
For a moment, consider: The masters, like
Bruce Lee, with Jeet Kune Do, or
Mas Oyama, with his Kyokushin, or,
Gogen Yamaguchi, with his Japanese version
of Goju-Ryu, who took the art to another level by adding the free fighting
aspect. Peter Urban, who developed some of
our greatest champions, Karateka’s on the East Coast and around the world
with the USA version of Goju-Ryu. Another example:
Takayuki Kubota, who studied Goju-Ryu and Shotokan as a child, and by
the age of thirteen had the base for the system he developed, Gosoku-Ryu, an
art well recognized worldwide and proven in and out of the tournament ring.
He is a great example that age alone, does not necessitate experience,
knowledge or wisdom.
The list of examples goes on in Okinawa and Japan. I have
seen systems developed by strong martial artists, who had a purpose. I
stress the word, "purpose" If we went back in time and thought the way we do
today about change, then we would not have the different systems to choose
from that were
developed by old
masters.
It is not inferred that anyone
who has ever
earned a black belt
(and earned being the operative word), just go out and start a system. Some
do, but that is life. If you want to see it in writing how it all started,
look up and study all Lineage's', and see how so and so, learned from
so and so, and developed a system. Then, his student, so and so,
learned his system, but also moonlighted learning another system, and
in time, developed yet, another system! Understand, that these men
studied and trained hard, and did embody the systems they trained in. The
process of evolution arrives through the need to grow and adapt. It is a
part of life, and it goes on and on, and on.
What I
am saying is, if you have studied different systems and I don't mean you
learned a kata from a buddy, unless your buddy is a complete and thorough
instructor, and you participated in the basic levels of different systems,
understand them, and have embodied what the system has to offer, and have
realistically
defined their
weaknesses, (Yes folks, there are weaknesses, and absolutely nothing
works 100% of the time, as in most things; and if you believe that,( you can
check if the Brooklyn Bridge is still for sale), if you have indeed studied
the system in this fashion, then and only then, can you even ponder
developing your own system. This coupled with the fact that you have had a
good instructor with solid credentials,
Simply put, to learn anything without learning its meaning
and the thoughts that went behind the developer's mind, is like learning
words from a different language and not knowing what they mean, and that
would of course lead to some interesting conversation, don't you think? Tradition is great and should be understood and respected. It is a base,
library, model, prototype, or an archive to look at and study. But do
not knock someone just because you enjoy saying he or she is not
traditional. Hey, what are you saying? Like, did they just dream up a
kick, or a punch, or kata, or did they maybe get it from a traditional
prototype and run with it?
I personally believe that if you practice with respect and
work your basics to the limit, then you are training traditionally, and at
the very least, you are
"HARDCORE".
You never want to stand in front of someone and suggest that the kata they
are practicing is not traditional because there are no Goju-Ryu families for
instance that practice a kata in the same rhythm and with the same
technique. The same goes with shotokan and other systems. I am talking about
what exists in Okinawa, Japan, or here in the US. If that were the case,
then why do so many organizations exist?
Again,
I am speaking to all whom actually train, not to those with weak
basics because they did not have the courage to train and master it. Perhaps out of some notion, they think they no longer need more practice, or
never did practice period. Those are easy to spot on the dojo floor
or at tournaments, looking like crap, or worse, giving demonstrations.
The point to all this is, do you criticize everyone for not
being traditional, is that really a big deal to you? Or have you no idea
what motivated everyone that you recognize to be traditional or
non-traditional to do a kata differently other than
identifying his or her perspective
karate or Kobudo families? I personally give anyone respect that
dares to put on a gi and
train because it's not always easy
to a make a commitment to better yourself, no matter what the cost.
To those of
you that train, fight, or teach cage fighting,
"more power to you"!
You have embarked on an old tradition of "warrior against warrior." Hopefully along the way, you are teaching your students when
not to fight, as well as
when to engage.
Any comments or thoughts regarding this article
would be highly appreciated and posted. I can be reach at
:
shihanem@verizon.net
Yours in training and
sweat
Shuseki
Shihan Eddie Morales.
Edited by : Lydia Alicea
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACK TO SHIHAN EDDIE MORALES COVER
BACK
TO MAIN COVER
|